Сraft

For the dismissal of the elderly will be punished

For the dismissal of the elderly will be punishedAny dismissal without motive is unlawfully and calmly appealed in court

Boris Panteleev, a member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation:

– This initiative seems to me superfluous. It duplicates already existing in the Criminal and Labor legislation norms, which provide for responsibility for discrimination in hiring and dismissal. And the age criterion, of course, is also included there. If today a person goes to the labor inspectorate or a court with a statement that he is threatened with dismissal or has already been dismissed on the basis of age, then the judiciary must stand up for his defense. It should be taken as a declaration of preventive use. Legal experts have long insisted on stopping the amendments on frankly populist occasions.

Stalin Gurevich, lawyer:

– I consider it populism. There are no prospects for this initiative. Any dismissal without motive is unlawfully and calmly appealed in court. If there are no grounds, then at least 20, even 120 years – to dismiss the employer does not have the right. On the other hand, if the employee is guilty, but it can not be dismissed because of age, then this is a violation of the rights of the organization. Moreover, to prove in court that the employee was fired because of his age, and not because he worked badly, is almost impossible. And to bring someone to criminal responsibility, if his guilt is not proven, by law is impossible. So, in my opinion, this is such an attempt to calm people against the background of the forthcoming pension reform.

For the dismissal of the elderly will be punishedAny dismissal without motive is unlawfully and calmly appealed in court

Boris Panteleev, a member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation:

– This initiative seems to me superfluous. It duplicates already existing in the Criminal and Labor legislation norms, which provide for responsibility for discrimination in hiring and dismissal. And the age criterion, of course, is also included there. If today a person goes to the labor inspectorate or a court with a statement that he is threatened with dismissal or has already been dismissed on the basis of age, then the judiciary must stand up for his defense. It should be taken as a declaration of preventive use. Legal experts have long insisted on stopping the amendments on frankly populist occasions.

Stalin Gurevich, lawyer:

– I consider it populism. There are no prospects for this initiative. Any dismissal without motive is unlawfully and calmly appealed in court. If there are no grounds, then at least 20, even 120 years – to dismiss the employer does not have the right. On the other hand, if the employee is guilty, but it can not be dismissed because of age, then this is a violation of the rights of the organization. Moreover, to prove in court that the employee was fired because of his age, and not because he worked badly, is almost impossible. And to bring someone to criminal responsibility, if his guilt is not proven, by law is impossible. So, in my opinion, this is such an attempt to calm people against the background of the forthcoming pension reform.

Nadezhda Gnedaya, Muscovite:

– As a person of retirement age, it was difficult for me to find a job now, and several years ago. This is an eternal problem, and I know from conversations with friends that not only did I encounter this. Employers simply do not want to hire people of age. They refuse under various pretexts. I do not know with what it is connected, but it is so. Or there is another situation: you can get a job, but on different terms, rather than young. Most often, they offer a salary less. Or a reduced working day and a part-time job. Therefore, I support the measure proposed by the state.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *